Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
MCU Home Search Contacts Study Events Site Map Thai/Eng
 
MCU

First Page » Miss Ampawan Tansuwansopon
 
Counter : 16871 time
Comparative Analysis Ñāna between Six Schools Indian Philosophy and Theravāda Buddhist Philosophy 2010
Researcher : Miss Ampawan Tansuwansopon date : 05/06/2012
Degree : พุทธศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต(ปรัชญา)
Committee :
 
 
 
Graduate : 2553
 
Abstract

This thesis has the objective: (1) to learn about the concepts of ñāa by the six schools of Indian philosophy; (2) to learn about the concept of ñāa by Theravāda Buddhist philosophy; and (3) to analytically compare the concepts of ñāa in the six schools of Indian Philosophy and the concept in Theravāda Buddhist philosophy.

The findings from the study reveal that the concepts of  ñāa by the six schools of Indian philosophy, namely, Nhayaya, Waisesika, Savakaya, Yoga, Mimangsa and Vedanta, indicate that to attain a ñāa is to understand about the Attā or Shivataman or Purusa (life), and the ultimate thing or Poramattaman or Brahman (the greatest life). In other words, one should know how to purify one’s shivataman or purusa so as to free one’s self from all the agony and from the circle of life-death and reincarnation. The six schools of Indian philosophy put the emphasis on Veda which is the ultimate scripture. To study Veda allows people to attain knowledge which is an element of ñāa. These six schools of Indian philosophy believe that to practise the Atsadang Yoga or the 8 Principles of Yoga will enable the practitioners to do meditation which is the main factor that causes Panyañāa (wisdom). This will purify Moksa – the land of eternal peace.

As for the Theravāda Buddhist philosophy, this school of philosophy believes that ñāa is the knowledge in the truth of life, which consists of 4 respects, namely, thukkha (the problem), smuhathai (the cause of the problem), niroth (the understanding in the cause of the problem) and muk (the solution to the problem. These four respects of the truth of life will lead to the three types of ñāa, namely, sajjañāa, kijjañāa and katañāa. the knowledge in the three types of ñāa will then lead to 12 ñāatassana (perspectives), namely, round 1: thukkhasajjañāa, smuhathaisajjañāa, nirothsajjañāa and mukksajjañāa; round 2: kijjañāa in thukka, kijjañāa in smuhathai, kijjañāa in niroth and kijjañāa in muk; and round 3: katañāa in thukka, katañāa in smuhathai, katañāa in niroth and katañāa in muk. The real knowledge in all the three ñāa leads to the understanding of the Trilaksana Principle which suggests that all the things in this world are anijjang (impermanent) thukkhang (subject to suffering) and anattā (non-self). In other words, everything happens, remains and perishes. This ñāa can be obtained when people follow the ‘The Noble Eightfold Paths’ principle and practise vipassana  so as to consider the four respects such as kaya, vethana, jittā and dhamma.

Compared with each other to see the similarity and difference, the six Indian schools philosophy and Theravāda Buddhist philosophy are similar to each other because they teach people to attain knowledge so as to understand life and stop the life cycle so as to attain Moksa or Nirvana. However, the six Indian schools and Theravāda Buddhist are different from each other in terms of the knowledge in self-identity of an individual. The six Indian schools define ñāa as an Attā or Shivataman or Purusa which is immortal and needs purification. At the mean time, Theravāda Buddhist defines ñāa as the knowledge of one’s self which is non-self. Both schools of philosophies suggest that ñāa can be obtained just when a person avoids bad things (believes in Silas) and regularly does meditation. However, Theravāda Buddhist emphasizes on vipassana by considering the four aspects such as kaya, vethana, jittā and dhamma

download

Download :
 
 
Copyright © Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University All rights reserved 
Maintained by: webmaster@mcu.ac.th 
Last Update : Thursday February 9, 2012